Hi Fang Min,Having read over your powerpoint I understand fully how you went about arguing against Ganeri and why, and I completely agree that 1) kliSTa-manas is already erroneous, 2) self/mineness refers to AlayavijJAna (in the sense that manas has the darzana-bhAga of Alaya as its Alambanapratyaya), and 3) YogAcAra theory of consciousness is not independent from its error theory.I have one
Hi Tanaka-san, thank you for posting your presentation. I could not attend the workshop so I am glad to be able to take a look.I have always been puzzled about the Madhyamaka rejection of intrinsic nature, particularly their argument from dependency (Slide 17). Does the fact that everything arises dependently show that nothing can have intrinsic nature? I also wonder if any Abhidharma-oriente
Hi Gustav, thanks for your suggestion. I want to clarify your suggestion. When you say "include it", what does the "it" refer to, and by dependent origination do you intend to mean origination of cognitions, physical things, or all things generally? Sorry I do remember you mentioned about cognition during the workshop but forgot the details.